Everything for 4K! Part II: Quantitative data to see the performance of 4K display and MSI MSI GTX1070 graphics card

Out of the box, wait for the link to the first post.....

That's right, that is, he half-price AOC LV 24 inch 4k monitor, opened my 618-year-old robbery, when the special price to kill 1299.... so I paid for it

Usually 2399, 2499, and then on June 2nd, 3rd directly half price 1299....I decisively bought it..... Wallet began to shrink

Good horse with good saddle, so I bought a relatively cost-effective graphics card GTX1070

——————————————————————————————————————————————————————————————————————————————————————

1299 special AOC LV 24 4K monitor worth buying it?

I can't answer you directly with this question. I specially went to find a good friend and borrowed Starscream 4 for quantitative testing.

Don't call me, I had a subjective feeling before Starscream 4, and this special version of the leaked light is a lot of Tucao, I have here, not very serious, barely able to accept, unless every day to see all black .......... and then Dark spots.............

The color is not the same as my AOC IF23. I'm still more accustomed to IF23 ccft+ips configuration and color representation.

Color gamut performance, 100% sRGB, and 82% AdobeRGB, that is, the daily use of the color gamut is saturated, but the color of PS and other professional-level mapping areas is only 82% of the range.

The results show that the gamma value (luminosity) of the LV 24 4K is 2.2, and the gamma value affects the tone of the graph median or the gray level of the middle level.

The tested data fit well with the gamma 2.2 curve, and you can see that the optimization is very good.

A list of brightness and contrast results. Compared with IPS, high transmittance, high brightness, and high contrast, PLS does not seem to show up, ah, this performance .....

The △E (color brightness uniformity) under different brightness, except that the values ​​in the lower left corner and the lower right corner will exceed 3, and the rest will be within 3 - this is the concept of the Shenma horse? However, propaganda is △E<3........

ΔE can quantify the accuracy of color reproduction to a value that accurately reflects the accuracy of the display's color. Therefore, the smaller the number, the better. The higher the score, the more distorted the color.

The ΔE value is between 1.6 and 3.2. The human eye can hardly discern the difference in color.

Between 3.2 and 6.5, professionally trained individuals can distinguish between them, but ordinary people do not observe the difference.

The brightness deviation range is a bit large..... The brightest middle and lower part and the darkest upper left and center right deviation are nearly 17-19%... This egg hurts.....

A summary of the monitor

Before there was a friend in the very early time of 2499 to buy one, when he tested, it is a perfect screen, no leakage, â–³ E, brightness uniformity and other parameters can be invincible, and 1299 special AOC LV 24 4K The monitor, compared with his desk, can only explain two sentences again:

you get what you pay for.

Buy did not sell fine!

If you think of it as a monitor with a value of 1299, then everything is acceptable .......... But if you ask me how this batch of 2399 is now ... I really do not know ......

24 inch 4k display is currently the most painful place

Magnifying the fonts is actually not a problem. Using the win10 system can make many people have to go through some process of adaptation.

But the most uncomfortable thing is that ... QQ and other chat tools, other people's expressions, screenshots, pictures are too small, and your screenshots sent pictures in others 1080P monitor, is a very large 4k picture full size The size is 4 times that of 1080P! ! ! ! ....... That is, you can't see the original size with the human being. You enlarge the display ratio, and your own facial expressions are tyrants. If you send screenshots to others, it will cause a chat box to make a tyrant-- Although the display is very delicate.....there is no solution at this moment - either buy a 32-inch or above 4K monitor, or wait for the software vendor to solve it.

Graphics test

In the DX12 video card, Fraps failed, unable to record the number of frames, quantify the benchmark test is to bring the Benchmark steam game, and then choose to support DX12 game - Killer 6, Tomb Raider 10, odd point of the ashes.

Stable standby power consumption after entering the WIN10 system! Can only say I7 6700+GTX1070 meritorious service.

3DMARK theory test

This test we all know 3Dmark FireStrike - 1080P load test

Load test under 3Dmark FireStrike Extreme 1440P 1440P=25601440=2.K

Load test under 3Dmark FireStrike Ultra 4K resolution 4K=38402160=2160P

The test results are shown in the figure. At the end there will be a summary table....

3DMARK update, more Time Spy test ..... However this test heard, very eat CPU ... 10C 20T 6950X + GTX1080 results on W.....

I bought the CD-KEY early, but I don't know where to buy the new Time Spy key, if the full set of STEAM...

Since Furmark was beaten up by various kinds of games, I prefer to use 3DMARK's test to record power consumption. As a result, there are now more humanized test items, call ..... Yes, this is very halal.

Record the full load power consumption during the test.

The STEAM version of the killer 6 was used for testing.

Killer 6 settings when testing the benchmark.

Final test score

After we change the resolution to 1080P, see what happens

Final test results.

Tomb Raider 10 game settings, check DX12 option!

4k resolution test process, and the final benchmark test scores.

To maintain the same settings, the resolution is changed to 1080P and the same benchmark test is performed.

The singularity is ashes, resolution is 4K, all settings are open to maximum, and the benchmark is run for testing.

Finally get the test results.

With the same settings, the resolution becomes 1080P. Run the benchmark again to get the final result.

Well, I've put together a table of all the test results... Easy to understand

Summary of GTX1070 Duke

GTX1070, at present, seems to be a relatively cost-effective graphics card, beyond the 980ti's performance, memory capacity is greater, power consumption, fever is lower, DX12 full support, many new technology blessing, the price is relatively cheaper than 980TI - of course This price will deter many people.

I think the most interesting point is the battle between the RX480 and the GTX1060. It is very curious to see how the volume-based graphics cards go.

4K or more than 32-inch good ~~~~~~~~~~~4k... is not really suitable