Many people may have heard that artificial intelligence can already write articles, but you may not know that editing robots have long been one of Wikipedia's most important contributing groups. In 2001, Wikipedia introduced the concept of robot editors. Any user can create a separate Wikipedia account for their own robots. Simply label the account according to Wikipedia's social networking regulations and allow the robot to participate in Wikipedia editing. In 2014, robots completed 15% of editorial actions in all Wikipedia languages. They identified, revoked vandalism, locked pages that had been tampered with frequently, identified typos and diseased sentences, and created links between different languages. Automatically import content outside the site, conduct data mining, identify infringing content, and provide guidance for novice editors. In a recent report released by researchers, researchers have found 6,627 suspected robotic accounts on 13 editions of Wikipedia. These robot edits come from different creators and follow the creator (human) for their independence. Custom rules are maintained at Wikipedia. Then, the question arises: Will these robots quarrel with each other? In conclusion, the answer is yes. In fact, the conflict between robot editors is much higher than that between humans. The study tracked 1,549 of 6,627 suspected robot account numbers and captured their behavioral records for the 2001-2010 period in 13 Wikipedia language versions. Studies have shown that it is very common for robots to revoke or modify articles between each other. Each robot at English Wikipedia has an average of 105 robot edits removed, which is 3 times higher than the data between humans; but at German Wikipedia, the number of canceled each other drops to 24, while Portuguese robots are as high as 185 times. This proves that the robots have different conflicts between different languages ​​(cultures). It can even be said that compared to "internal affairs," robots do a worse job in "diplomatics." The researchers found that in the same language, the clash of robots was significantly lower than that of cross-linguistic conflicts. This is because in the same language, a robot tends to only look at specific items of pages, and different robots govern across the river and do not invade each other. Language and environment influence the robot's code of conduct But after many robots "occupy" their corresponding words in their own language, they "grab" the same term in other languages, causing conflicts with robot editing in other languages. This is particularly prominent in some controversial countries and figures (for example, former Pakistani President, Uzbekistan, Estonia), as if these robots were also politically inclined. However, the high number of robot editing conflicts does not mean that robots are better than humans. In fact, most robots change and cancel between robots much less than humans. Many of them are due to different robots. The understanding of grammar and phrasing cannot be changed like human beings do. Researcher Yasseri said that (editing) robots cannot work in abstract media. They “think†and act like humans through language. Therefore, language and environment can significantly influence the behavioral rules of robots. Therefore, robots are not humans. It is impossible to work without sociality or position. This cross-linguistic conflict was eased in 2013 because Wikipedia began using Wikipedia to transfer entries between different language versions beginning in 2013, which significantly obstructed the robots from "mutually violating territorial sovereignty." But at the same time, as the number of robots and activity increase, the number of conflicts between robots becomes higher and higher. This is a bit like a video that once appeared on the Internet and allows two Siri conversations, and they will be trapped in an infinitely nonsensical dialogue. When each robot stubbornly believes that its own modification is correct, it will fall into the depths of infinite feedback-though their modifications may not be important and they are right. This totally meaningless conflict sometimes lasts for several years and significantly reduces the efficiency of the robot until the owner of one of them discovers and adjusts it to end. Researchers say that overall, Wikipedia is an excellent example of observing the robotic ecosystem. First of all, the number of robots is large enough, and secondly it is a well-intentioned robot socialization - all robots are to make articles better; in addition, the wiki is a society led by a unified rule, not completely open space. However, in a more open network environment such as Twitter or Facebook, the interaction between robots may have very serious consequences. The Microsoft chat robot Tay, who was once "educated" by a netizen as a Nazi, is a typical example. The purpose of this study is to better understand the robot's response in different social environments, especially when a robot is involved in a robotic group. Because with the development of robots, we fall into a world where robots are responsible for most social work. It seems to be an inevitable trend. Therefore, in addition to dealing with humans, robots must learn how to communicate with similar people.
This is a special maskking High GT e-cigarette product series. We sell high gt, maskking high gt ice coke, and other maskking high gt flavors.
We are specialized electronic cigarette manufacturers from China, Vapes For Smoking, Vape Pen Kits suppliers/factory, wholesale high-quality
products of Modern E-Cigarette R & D and manufacturing, we have the perfect after-sales service and technical support. Look forward to
your cooperation!
maskking high gt vape,maskking high gt puffs bar, maskking high gt vape kit, maskking high gt disposable vape, maskking high gt ice coke vape
Ningbo Autrends International Trade Co.,Ltd. , https://www.mosvapor.com