As far as 2014 is concerned, individuals feel that Sony is still the best at the low end and the 4K model. The texture of LG is still the closest to the plasma bright style. Samsung's changes are relatively large and some of its features have been lost.
Some suggestions for buying TV:
1, to the store can not see the conclusions of the demonstration film, you must use your own source 720P, 1080P and so on!
2. It is recommended that 1080P use Transformers 4 to test dynamic, metal texture, color accuracy, and shadow detail!
3, 720P suggested a relatively good picture quality, a relatively poor one, test optimization capabilities!
4,720P animation test color transition, game test material texture, texture, dynamic, etc.
Foreword
The overall impression of smart TVs in 2014: The 4K model is better than the new 2K model! If last year was the era of 2K microdermabrasion, then this year is the era of 2K paste machine! In fact, the current environment is even worse for the novice to go to the store to observe. However, in order to survive and reduce costs, the joint venture manufacturers are inevitably shrinking! The joint venture's localization of the picture quality has gone one step further, but do not think that it is domestically produced. Domestically, apart from a few models, most of them have poor performance in image color adjustment, image resolution, and image optimization. !
As far as 2014 is concerned, individuals feel that Sony is still the best at the low end and the 4K model. The texture of LG is still the closest to the plasma bright style. Samsung’s changes are relatively large and some of its features are lost.
This year's 4K model is quite rampant, but most consumers still think that 4K is a solution with high resolution, and the quality of the image is definitely superficial, ignoring the matching degree of the signal!
The quality of 4K TVs also has some flaws. For example, the sense of space is poor. It almost feels like a layer of plane painting. The depth of the scene before and after the scene is almost lost. There is a lack of texture due to interpolation, optimization of 720P, 1080P poor film source optimization are relatively poor ~ some low-end 4K often see 720P is a mass of paste ~
The advantage of the 4K model is that the details are more than the 2K model of the same generation. Although the ports are basically equipped with the HDMI 2.0 standard, but in actual use, many models feel that the overall picture quality is not as good as the 4K models of the first generation last year. ! Of course, this does not mean that 4K machines are not good, in fact, there are also many very good 4K models, regardless of chip optimization, picture quality are very good, but also more thoughtful works, this to the following mention!
The 2K model is obviously weakened, and it feels lower than last year's 2013. It's not surprising that all brands are like this. When the price drops again, we must also consider that 4K should at least look better than the 2K model. !
This year, the best thing to do with 4K is still SONY, X9000B and X9500B. The optimization of low-resolution signals is still the best. If you buy a machine with better status, you will find that watching online video is also very good! As for the OLEDs that represent the future flat-panel TV picture quality technology, there is now only LG in the updated model. OLED in color saturation, contrast is higher than the existing LED LCD TV a grade. But perhaps the chip's processing power, LG's OLED's color accuracy, dark field details or some are not very satisfied! In the future, I personally hope that SONY/Panasonic can re-create civil-grade OLED display devices! There is SONY's STE-OLED foundation, the cost can not be reduced to the degree of personal acceptance, to see Sony willing to reduce the cost of materials or find replacement materials!
In the whole of 2014, the 2K model with particularly good image quality is not one. It is relatively neutral than the previous years, and it is acceptable to you. However, it must be amazing and shocking! The quality of the various manufacturers is mainly reflected in the 4K model, so this year's friends on the quality requirements, it is recommended to buy high-end 4K models!
From the perspective of repair rate SONY this year features 1: There is no real 200HZ models, almost all models are really the highest is only 120HZ! The dynamic strength depends more on the control of the backlight!
This year's feature 2:2K high-end picture quality has dropped dramatically! Almost all 2K high-end have missing face detail in default parameters!
This year features 3:4K models flooding. Only a few 4K models are outstanding! Most 4K models are not practical!
1, SONY new full model analysis (including the difference with the previous model)
This year's low-end Sony R300B/R350B/WM series should pay attention to the fact that most production sites are in Xiamen, which means that it is the OEM model, not very recommended! Because last year's OEM R300A I looked at the standard definition of R421A. So when choosing the low-end machine of this grade, I suggest that you can also consider the low-end models of other brands.
Although R430B and R480B are not OEM products, they are still slightly inferior to the higher W series because of the use of cheaper Taiwan low-end panels for panel purchase. It is not very recommended for all R-series models this year. It is not on the same level as the low-end R470A last year. It is not as good as the R470A.
And with the higher level W600B/W700B, W600B is really comparable to the R470A last year. The accuracy of color control is better, and it will not be too strong! The R470A appears to be a bit more full of detail, but the gap is small and acceptable!
The most important thing is that when looking at the Blu-ray source, it will not appear too dermabraid in the default parameters, and will not significantly lose the face detail! The overall image is very delicate! Sharpness is just right, although the clarity is still not up to the top level, but it is considered the best model in the low-end models, none!
As for the W700B as a replacement for the R500A model, cancelling 3D is a good thing. It's a little more cruel than the R500A, but it won't be affected by 2D quality in 3D! Leakage control is also better than R500A, and W600B belong to the same grade, but the WVGA is still better in color accuracy! In addition, the fineness of the lines of some of the sources is more delicate than that of the W600B, and the W700B is even more rugged.
W800B, W850B still have some progress with respect to W800A, and the progress is that standard-definition cable is not as good as W800A! To be a little clearer and sharper ~ The overall detail and contrast ratio is higher than W600B! After all, the price is a little more expensive, or is there a reason for expensive! The brightness is a lot higher than W800A, but the viewing angle and color are significantly reduced. The color and last year's W800A are two styles. This year's W800B looks very low color gamut! The overall law-abiding, there are not many special advantages, it will not seem bad, W800B is not as good as the W850B! Details of the two are worse than the R550A, watching high-definition is not as good as R550A fine sharpness and sharpness also worse! The overall picture quality feels worse than the R550A! Dynamic fuzzy control In general, some sources of dynamic fuzzy smearing are still quite obvious!
W950B color accuracy is not as good as last year's W800A, the default parameters in the face when looking at the film when the skin is still more serious, need to buy a hand, and then adjust the parameters on their own! The color is rich and bright, the brightness is slightly higher than last year's W950A, but the feeling of microdermabrasion is still slightly obvious! Sometimes you can see some color blocks and rough image edges! In the store to see the demonstration film may feel more vivid and clear, when looking at their own film source, the problem of dermabrasion will be exposed! With a long time feel color, sometimes the color of the image will look very strange, color control is sometimes good and sometimes very poor ~ see Blu is not suitable! If you look at Blu-ray I would rather everyone buy last year's 65w850a/70r550a! In addition to watching the cable as a whole, depending on the last year's W800A to be better, hey! Leakage is generally worse than W800A control! In addition to the brightness of the W950B is higher, the contrast is higher, in essence, still not as good as W800A!
From the comprehensive quality point of view, SONY's 4K camp is indeed the best of all brands in the country, but also feel that SONY is doing a good job 4K. In contrast, SONY's 4K model is also the most expensive of all brands, there is no real 4K low-end machine! In this year, if there is a demand for picture quality, SONY's 4K model is the best choice, if you are playing games, watching 720P, watching online video, or even watching the cable! Looking at 1080P, watching 4K and other full-featured applications, SONY's 4K is also really doing optimization, chip optimization is the biggest advantage of SONY.
2, SONY recommended purchase models
Last year's model, or a new opportunity to buy last year's model is better! Recommended now can also buy 65W850A, 70R550A.
Low level: W600B/W700B series
Recommended reason: These two models are stronger than other brands with the same model, do not recommend buying R480B/R350B. If you buy a low-end model, W600B/W700B as the first choice!
Mid-range grade: 850B/W950B series
Recommended reason: 850B has no obvious weaknesses, is quite satisfactory, and there is no obvious dermabrasion phenomenon, but there is no shocking feeling! 950B feeling of dermabrasion is still relatively obvious under the default value.
To greatly adjust the parameters after you buy your hand, there will be a big improvement!
High-end grade: S9000B/X9000B/X9500B series
Recommended reason: Sony 4K is the best chip image processing of all brands, which is the preferred brand in buying 4K models! The X9 full range has the best details in shadows, video on the web, in all 4K models,
Optimized for low-resolution signals such as 720P chip sources! Although the color standard is far from perfect, it is the most comfortable in the 4K LCD. All X9 series have better picture quality than W950B and other 2K models!
To sum up, this year Sony is the most worthwhile to buy in the low-end machine and 4K!
3, LG new full model analysis (including the difference with the previous model)
This year LG's 2K model actually has a large degree of decline in quality, although the color saturation has improved, but it has become a lot of paste, the particles are relatively thick! And slightly closer to the point, you can clearly see a horizontal line of the panel, 3D polarized lines. In general, the 2K model is not as good as last year's LA series! Personally feel that the 2K model such as the GB7800/GB6500 is actually not as good as the 55LA6600 last year.
LG lowest-end LB55 and 56 series, in this grade has been very small and domestic differences, in addition to the feeling or to be more delicate, and other domestic and some domestic quality is almost not much difference - of course, the price is very cheap! Even the 55-inch LB series is not even 5000, almost all domestic TV prices! If you don't watch TV basically, you can only consider it as a master, but you can also consider it. There are some commercial uses that are more suitable!
GB6310 and GB6500 and GB6580, the quality of the three are almost no difference, the biggest difference is that GB6310 no 3D, GB6500, GB6580 is with 3D! And Sony's W800B is the same grade, the two styles are different, W800B's color is much lighter, and LG's GB6310/GB6500 color saturation to be significantly higher! The default colors of the two are slightly different. After buying home, they still need to readjust the difference between GB6500 and GB6580. One is only for Gome's exclusive supply, and the other is for Suning's exclusive supply, unless there is an individual difference in picture quality. The other aspects are basically the same. Compared with last year's LA6600 color, the GB6500/GB6580 will have to become quite strange, and the default value is somewhat cold. See standard GB6 series are generally, optimization is not very good, can only say barely look okay. The performance of 720P is also OK, similar to last year's optimization level
GB7800 as the LG's most high-end 2K model this year, in the default parameters, will look better in the mall than the same level of 55W950B, whether it is the same demo or your own film source! High color saturation, and sometimes feel a little red overflow, which is slightly reddish ~ The overall picture quality is not as good as LA8800, especially to see the HD face detail, has obviously not as good as the LA8800's details! However, as the 2K general shrinking environment this year, it is also worth buying a 2K model, this model's best recommended purchase size is 60 inches! Contrast with the 55W950B, in fact, half a catty, no one better than where to go, adjust the parameters of the 55W950B I think the color transition and optimize the performance slightly better! However, some of the textures of the GB7800 I prefer, so it is really awkward with the W950B, making it difficult to choose! The standard definition of Samsung and Sharp is better, but there is basically no surprise! 720P is still pretty good! 1080P The phenomenon of missing human face detail, personal suggestions to use the game mode and movie mode will be improved!
LG's 4K model! The difference between UB8250/UB8300 series, UB8250 and UB8300 is that UB8250 has no WIFI, no dynamic remote control, no 3D, but the price will be relatively cheap! From the price point of view, the UB8300 is very cost-effective, UB8250 is the corresponding Samsung HU6000, and UB8300 is the corresponding Samsung HU7000! The disadvantage of the UB8250/UB8300 lies in the poor picture quality of standard-definition cable. Although this is a disadvantage, I have not seen a few standard-definitions this year. Even the 2K model has not seen SD optimization. The details of watching 1080P video than their own GB6500/GB7800 is obviously much better, cost is still very good! High color saturation, see a lot of films will have a bright feeling! It is the aspect of color transition that is still relatively weak. Sometimes it feels that the green color is green and too consistent. If you look at Blu-ray to please the eyes, compared to Samsung's 4K, the color should be warmer and softer!
This year's low-cost 4K model 55UB8300 price is the highest! Full-featured, if the standard definition is not particularly stringent, the UB8300 is still worth buying as a 4K machine transition model!
UB8800, the same 4K high-end model, in addition to delicate than the UB8300, the appearance of workmanship is more refined, the function is almost the same as the UB8300 ~ and UB8300 the overall picture quality is almost a little more refined in the optimization of 720P, some color transitions also appear more refined some! But the difference is too big, the price is not as good as the UB8300, and it doesn't feel like the difference! Color saturation is as high, green and red are more intense!
UB9500, high-end sub-flagship 4K series, sharpness has declined relative to the 9650, but the image edge is more delicate, color saturation has improved! However, the color control of the color is not as good as last year's 9650, and the dynamic progress has been made! In addition to the demo of the store's demo, the actual home use is slightly less effective than the Sony X8500B! But the dynamics are better than the X8500B. It's very common to see the SD card. The 720P is also rough. Watching 1080P is not too bad. Better than the PS4 optimization is better! Blue color saturation, it will look bright ~
UB9800, LG flagship 4K model, high color saturation, red, green and blue colors are very bright and rich, especially red and green. The performance of the 720P 1080P optimization is good, the sense of space is also very good, there is no big problem with sharpness resolution! The color of the color accuracy is still inferior to Sony's X9000B, a little too saturated feeling, because I use Transformers 4 for testing, in the metal texture is also more powerful X9000B some! The details of the details of the image are also inferior to Sony's X9000B. Dynamic and X9000B close, but also belong to 4K which dynamic better models! However, the X9000B feels better, but the actual use of some sources feels rather UB9800 is more pleasing to the eye, a little strange ~ may be more pleased with the eyes of it! The UB9800 is not as overflowing from the HU9800 as Samsung's HU9800. The optimized performance of the 720P is better than that of the Samsung HU9800.
Overall, it can be used as a preferred 65-inch 4K Japanese brand, the price is not cheap and X9000B price close! The optimization performance of playing the game is much better than I thought, I feel pretty good model in 4K! If you have the ability to re-adjust the color scale in the future, you have the potential to recall high-quality images.
OLED, EA9700 quality is LG's best 2K model, the color gamut is really high, from the Blu-ray source, the color transition is actually very similar to the plasma style, at least not on the same material color Never change! Look at the blue is also good Contrast color is very good, but at a closer look can sometimes see the polarization of very small stripes, see the blue effect is very good! Is color accuracy still need to adjust! The quasi-liquidity style is not the plasma style, which is very unpleasant. The black level basically does not have to say, is very good, is the dark part detail will have the lack! Need to adjust the GAMMA value in the menu! Dynamically, because there is no MEMC, look at the Blu-ray with a slight sense of gratitude. The signal at 60HZ is completely free of worry. Dynamics and plasma are very close! The EC9300 has not seen it yet. It is not yet on the shelves. After a while, it is necessary to add more!
4, LG new models to buy models
LG's 2K is basically backward, 4K adds a lot of good price models!
2K mid-range models: GB6500/GB6580/7800 series
Recommended reason: 2K models are good value for money, after the adjustment has a good picture quality output, personally feel more worth buying than W800B.
2K high-end grade: EA9700 series
Recommended reason: OLED, with the color transition performance that LED LCD TV does not have, can also be considered the best 2K model for this year.
4K mid-range: UB8300 series
Recommended reason: Full-featured, high color saturation, watching Blu-ray effect is okay! The most important thing is that the price is cheap! Cost-effective within 10,000 55-inch 4K in the highest cost!
4K high-end grade: UB8800 series
Recommended reason: Best 55 inch 4K TV in ten thousand yuan, no other choice!
4K high-end grade: UB9800 series
Recommended reason: LG's highest 4K model quality performance, as the first choice for the Japanese brands do not buy high-end 4K!
Plasma: 60PB560H
Recommended reason: high cost performance, as the first choice for TV entry-level players, can also be used as a transitional model!
5, Samsung new models to buy models
Samsung 2K is also regressing, 4K models partial cold!
2K high-end models: H7500 series
Recommended reason: Good shape, quality can have a place in the 2K model! Samsung is also the best 2K model this year!
4K high-end grade: HU8500/HU8800 series
Recommended reason: Good shape, color is more natural, and almost the same HU9800 picture quality, but the price is a lot cheaper.
4K high-end grade: HU9800 series
Recommended reason: Surface 4K, detail sharpness is good, if Samsung is willing to do a good job optimizing the chip, in fact there is still potential!
32 inch: 32R430B, 32W700B
40 inches: 40W600B, 40HU6000
42 inch: 42UB8200, 42W700B, 42GB6500
47 inch 47GB7800
48 inches: 48W600B
49" 49UB8800, 49X8500B
50 inch 50W700B
55 inches 55X9000B, 55EA9700, 55UB8800, 55UB8300, 55HU9800, 55HU8500, 55W950B, 55GB7800
60 inches: 60GB7800, 60PB560H, 60W850B, 60H7500
65 inches: 65X9000B, 65S9000B, 65X9500B, 65UB9800, 65HU9800, 65W950B, 65H7500
70 inches: 70W850B, 70GB7200, 70X8500B
75 inches: 75S9000B, 75H7500
78-79 inches: 79X9000B, 79UB9800, 78HU9800
84-85 inch: 85X9500B, 84UB9800
6, the best picture quality recommended
The highest quality recommended in 2014, the same size is close to the same quality I also listed several 32W700B, 40W600B, 42UB8200, 49UB8800, 55X9000B, 55EA9700, 60GB7800, 60W850B, 65X9500B, 65S9000B, 65X9000B, 70W850B, 75S9000B, 79X9000B, 85X9500B
Headphone speaker is a king of speaker unit which is used for headphone, it also called headphone driver. These speakers have high sound pressure level, fast frequency response, wide frequency response range and low distortion. Headphone Speakers are mainly used for voice headphone (e.g. customer service phone, call center headphone, military intercom headset- ) and music headphone (e.g. Bluetooth headphone, sport headphone, game headphone-).
Our main headphone speakers include:
1) From the diameter, we have speakers in 23mm ~ 57mm.
2) From the impedance, we have speakers of 32ohm/150ohm/300ohm/1000ohm.
FAQ
Q1. What is the MOQ?
XDEC: 2000pcs for one model.
Q2. What is the delivery lead time?
XDEC: 15 days for normal orders, 10 days for urgent orders.
Q3. What are the payment methods?
XDEC: T/T, PayPal, Western Union, Money Gram.
Q4. Can you offer samples for testing?
XDEC: Yes, we offer free samples.
Q5. How soon can you send samples?
XDEC: We can send samples in 3-5 days.
Bluetooth Headphone Speaker,Sport Headphone Speaker,Hifi Headphone Speaker,Music Headphone Speaker
Shenzhen Xuanda Electronics Co., Ltd. , https://www.xdecspeaker.com